Quality Management

For our customers and for DQS, quality is the key to sustainable business success. 

Environmental Responsibility

Environmental Responibility

Only systematic environmental protection can create a balance.



Manufacturers, OEM suppliers, IATF, VDA – if this is your industry, we have the certification services you need.

Food & Hygiene

food feed hygiene

Food and Hygiene safety systems provide a first-line defense for consumer safety.

Workplace Safety

Workplace Safety

Taking good care of your employees is one of the essential goals. 

IT and Service Management

IT and Service Management

 Find out what DQS has to offer for your business.

Social Responsibility

Social Responsibility

Securing basic human rights benefits your business, if you know which standards to apply. 

Medical Devices

Medical Devices

DQS offers a variety of services in the field of medical devices approval. 

Animal Feed

Animal Feed

Because safety and quality of animal feed is the first stage for consumer safety.



If your value stream needs wings to fly, a certification to the 9100 series by DQS will get it in the air. 

Risk Management

Risk Management

Risk is the effect of uncertainty on the achievement of objectives. 



We are looking for associate professional management system auditors to join our team.

DQS Newsletter

Connect With US

joomla vector social icons


Will human rights due diligence become a mandatory legal requirement in Germany? Statements from various government representatives have indicated that additional regulation may be on its way. Heated reactions from the private sector have been quick to follow. Ingo Kramer, President of the German Employers’ Association, went as far as to say that he hopes the government “abandons this nonsense”. But would it really hurt business if the German government made human rights due diligence mandatory?

Judging by the tone of the debate, the suggestion that human rights due diligence may become mandatory seems to have hit a nerve. For some, making due diligence mandatory is a necessary step to improve the human rights situation in global supply chains. For others, it is yet another bureaucratic measure without any real impact, while putting German companies at a competitive disadvantage. Before we jump into the controversy (and become a part of it), let’s consider the facts.

Human Rights Due Diligence: Is a new law on its way?

  • What is being planned?
    On February 10, 2019 the German daily newspaper TAZ reported that the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development is working on a law that would make human rights due diligence mandatory for German companies. The law would require companies to identify human rights risks in their supply chain and to take measures to reduce those risks.
  • Why would we need such legislative changes? 
    Germany already has a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAP), which it adopted in 2016. The plan lays down the responsibility of businesses in preventing human rights violations and provides guidance on the measures companies should take. The NAP focuses not only on the companies as such, but includes their suppliers and contractors, nationally and internationally. However, the NAP did not introduce sanctions for companies that do not assume their responsibility – it is an action plan rather than an enforceable law. Because voluntary approaches have their limits, the new law is being considered.
  • Who would be affected?
    Human rights due diligence would become mandatory for companies with over 250 employees and over 40 million Euros annual turnover. Affected companies have to take measures to ensure human rights compliance in their operations and supply chain, independently of whether suppliers are based in Germany or abroad.
  • When could human rights due diligence become mandatory? 
    Whether the proposed law will ever be voted is highly uncertain. At the moment, the government is monitoring to what extent German companies already comply with the expectations of the National Action Plan. This monitoring is to be completed by 2020. The Minister of Labour Hubertus Heil has stated that when the monitoring would show that less than 50 % of the affected companies meet the expectations, the intention is to make human rights due diligence mandatory by law. However, such a law would obviously have to be voted by the relevant institutions. On top of that, the monitoring itself has also become the subject of controversy, making it impossible to rule out any scenario. The only certainty seems that the importance of human rights due diligence will continue to grow in the foreseeable future.

The Arguments against the Plan – and why they do not hold

In an interview with Rheinische Post, the president of the German Employers Association Ingo Krämer called the bill “absurd”. This statement led to media headlines such as “Economy Against Human Rights Law” (Tagesschau) and “Private Sectors opposes Commitment to Human Rights” (Spiegel). In reality, the reactions from the private sector have been much more diverse. Leading companies such as Kik, Tchibo and Daimler welcome the initiative, because they feel a binding regulation would provide much-needed legal certainty. So what is all the fuzz about?

Counterargument # 1: “Competitive disadvantage for Germany in a globalized world”

One of the parties to fiercely oppose the plan for new legislation is the liberal FDP. Christoph Hoffmann, member of the German parliament, argued such a law could not work. “Trade takes place globally; the focus markets are no longer in Germany or Europe.” It would therefore be wrong to create special obligations only for German companies.

But would Germany really be the exception? Not quite – both Australia and the UK have already passed a Modern Slavery Act, France has the Duty of Vigilance Law since 2017, in Switzerland the Reponsible Business Initiative led to a counter-proposal by Parliament and similar measures are being discussed in Finland and Norway.

In addition, Hoffmann assumes that a legal regulation would discriminate against German companies internationally – an assumption that is at least questionable. A law that makes human rights due diligence would not only specify what is required of a company, but also make clear what cannot be reasonably expected of them. This ensures proportionality and legal certainty. Moreover, due diligence can increase investor confidence and protect the image of German brands internationally. Thus, the legal regulation would not weaken the German economy, but sustainably strengthen it.

Counterargument #2: “Legislation puts the brakes on voluntary initiatives”

In recent years, a variety of industry initiatives has sprung up, all aiming to ensure compliance with human rights in the supply chain. Would a new law thwart these voluntary efforts? The association Textil + Mode, for example, has already stated that such a law would “undermine the industry’s efforts in the textile alliance” (source).

If legislation were suddenly to formulate entirely new expectations, that would indeed create problems for industry initiatives that are already operational. However, there are no indications that the proposed law would radically change course. Almost all industry initiatives are based upon the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which are also at the heart of the National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights. Thus, the proposed legislation would be aligned with existing initiatives and may even contribute to their success.

Counterargument #3: “We have no influence over human rights in our supply chain“

“When I, as an entrepreneur, have personal influence over the production in my factory abroad, of course, I feel obligated to work according to our social and ecological standards,” said employer president Kramer. “But not when I cannot influence that, or as a medium-sized company, cannot even monitor it.” Similarly, the association Textil + Mode claims that it is not possible to control human rights in the supply chains abroad.

In our view, this argument is invalid for several reasons.

First, let’s replace the word “human rights” with “quality”. Who in their right mind would claim that quality cannot be monitored or influenced in the supply chain? Right – no one. Just as there are good practices and tools to ensure that suppliers comply with quality standards, similar methods can be used to ensure that suppliers comply with social and ethical requirements.

Of course, there are industry-specific factors that hamper monitoring, such as very long and complex supply chains, which present particular challenges to the textile industry. But even there, there are promising initiatives to increase transparency, benefiting not only the workers, but also the industry itself.

Second, an often-heard objection is that the purchasing power of small and medium-sized enterprises is too limited to influence suppliers. However, this is precisely what makes it necessary to have a regulating framework: If all German companies have the same expectations towards their suppliers, this generates the much-needed critical mass to exert influence.

Outlook: Assuming Responsibility for Human Rights in the Supply Chain

With or without legal obligation: Companies would be well advised to introduce procedures for human rights due diligence. Customers, investors, policymakers, workers and civil society expect companies to take responsibility for upholding human rights in their supply chain. Like any other risk, the risk of human rights violations is one that needs to be managed. If the government will not impose sanctions, customers will.

How DQS can support your Human Rights Due Diligence:

– Gap analysis and benchmarking of your due diligence procedures
– UN Human Rights Assessment
– Global Conformance Mark Certification
– Supplier audits across the globe
– Training and capability building
– Verification of sustainability reporting.

Source: DQS CFS website (https://dqs-cfs.com/2019/04/human-rights-due-diligence-why-regulation-is-not-a-bad-idea/).

For more information, please send email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Share this post

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TechnoratiSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

DQS Certification NEWS

INHOUSE TRAINING PT. WILO PUMPS INDONESIA ISO 9001:2015 (Awareness & Internal Audit)

INHOUSE TRAINING PT. WILO PUMPS INDONESIA ISO 9001:2015 (Awareness & Internal Audit) 23 Juli & 05 Agustus 2019 Berawal dari keinginan dan ambisi PT. Wilo Pumps Indonesia untuk ingin mendapatkan pengetahuan tentang ISO 9001:2015 dimana terdiri dari pengetahuan Awareness yang berupa pengetahuan dasar dari standar tersebut dan juga melihat perbedaan antara klausul ISO 9001 versi lama dengan versi yang terbaru. Sehingga bisa melihat kesesuaian yang akan di terapkan didalam perusahaan.

- by dqsindonesia
Read more »
Shaping DQS for the future

Shaping DQS for the future …was the main theme under which DQS managing directors from 60 countries gathered in Frankfurt for their annual International Management Meeting 2019. During this year’s meeting, the participants analyzed the current situation of DQS Group and its various international offices, easily summarized by stating that 2018 was one of the most succesful years so far, resulting in 125 000 audit days and 65 000 certificates in more than 130 countries, and that 2019 is off to

- by dqsindonesia
Read more »

GFSI UPDATES ITS BENCHMARKING CRITERIA: WHAT CAN WE EXPECT? “Safe food for consumers everywhere”. The vision of the Global Food Safety Initiative’s (GFSI) can only be put into practice if the requirements for food safety reflect the latest developments and learnings from the industry. In April 2019, GFSI released an update version of their bechmarking criteria for public consultation. What’s about to change and what do these changes mean for customers that are certified to IFS, BRCGS and FSSC

- by dqsindonesia
Read more »

IS CHINA A SUPPLY CHAIN RISK? LEARNINGS FROM THE JIANGSU EXPLOSION On March 21, a devastating explosion occurred in a chemical plant in Xiangshui, Jiangsu, China. 78 people lost their lives, over 617 persons were injured. Sadly, the explosion is not an isolated occurrence, but one in a long series of deadly accidents. If your company has high-risk suppliers in China, we encourage you to make sure your due diligence processes are watertight. The blast in Jiangsu is the latest in a long series

- by dqsindonesia
Read more »

HUMAN RIGHTS DUE DILIGENCE: WHY REGULATION IS NOT A BAD IDEA Will human rights due diligence become a mandatory legal requirement in Germany? Statements from various government representatives have indicated that additional regulation may be on its way. Heated reactions from the private sector have been quick to follow. Ingo Kramer, President of the German Employers’ Association, went as far as to say that he hopes the government “abandons this nonsense”. But would it really hurt business if

- by dqsindonesia
Read more »


JL. Margasatwa 4, Unit A. Cilandak Timur, Pasar Minggu, Jakarta Selatan 12560 Indonesia

Tel: (62-21) 22780821 (62-21) 22780823 (62-21) 22780343 Fax: (62-21) 22780837

Email: info@dqsindonesia.com

2018 ©Hani Bahanan-DQS Indonesia All rights reserved.